AI Co-Authorship Debate: Transparency, Provenance, and Advanced Tools
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
In this riveting episode from IBM Technology, the team debates the controversial topic of crediting AIs as co-authors. Marina Danilevsky, the Senior Research Scientist, argues for transparency by crediting AIs as assistants. Meanwhile, Chris Hay, the Distinguished Engineer and CTO of Customer Transformation, cheekily suggests including his trusty calculator in the credits. Nathalie Baracaldo, the Senior Research Scientist and Master Inventor, stresses the importance of maintaining the provenance of the data generated by these advanced systems.
Hosted by the charismatic Tim Hwang, the Mixture of Experts show dives into the latest AI trends, including OpenAI's groundbreaking Deep Research feature and the release of the highly anticipated o3-mini model. The team engages in a lively discussion on whether OpenAI's product launches are a response to mounting competition from DeepSeek, sparking a debate on the fast-paced nature of technological advancements in the AI landscape.
The conversation delves into the critical role of effective prompts in AI research tools and the potential impact on the diversity of research outcomes. Marina raises thought-provoking concerns about biases and limitations in AI-generated research, urging for a more nuanced approach to data analysis. As the team explores the challenges of human-AI interaction, they emphasize the need for smoother and more reliable interactions in the ever-evolving realm of artificial intelligence. Chris Hay and the team critique the o3-mini model for its performance in coding tasks, shedding light on both its strengths and limitations in addressing broader inquiries. This discussion underscores the growing trend towards specialized AI models tailored to specific tasks, signaling a new era in the field of artificial intelligence.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch OpenAI deep research, o3-mini, AI Action Summit, and Anthropic’s Constitutional Classifiers on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for OpenAI deep research, o3-mini, AI Action Summit, and Anthropic’s Constitutional Classifiers
Positive feedback on IBM content and MoE product
Discussion on AI ownership and copyright issues
Lack of governance on AI and concerns about political correctness in training models
Criticism of Microsoft's AI game plan
Mention of media as experts in finding outliers in scientific studies
Related Articles
Decoding Generative and Agentic AI: Exploring the Future
IBM Technology explores generative AI and agentic AI differences. Generative AI reacts to prompts, while agentic AI is proactive. Both rely on large language models for tasks like content creation and organizing events. Future AI will blend generative and agentic approaches for optimal decision-making.
Exploring Advanced AI Models: o3, o4, o4-mini, GPT-4o, and GPT-4.5
Explore the latest AI models o3, o4, o4-mini, GPT-4o, and GPT-4.5 in a dynamic discussion featuring industry experts from IBM Technology. Gain insights into advancements, including improved personality, speed, and visual reasoning capabilities, shaping the future of artificial intelligence.
IBM X-Force Threat Intelligence Report: Cybersecurity Trends Unveiled
IBM Technology uncovers cybersecurity trends in the X-Force Threat Intelligence Index Report. From ransomware decreases to AI threats, learn how to protect against evolving cyber dangers.
Mastering MCP Server Building: Streamlined Process and Compatibility
Learn how to build an MCP server using the Model Context Protocol from Anthropic. Discover the streamlined process, compatibility with LLMs, and observability features for tracking tool usage. Dive into server creation, testing, and integration into AI agents effortlessly.