Decoding OpenAI's 04 Mini vs 03 Models: Hype, Flaws & Progress
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
In this thrilling episode of AI Explained, the team delves into the latest buzz surrounding OpenAI's 04 Mini and 03 models. Buckle up, folks, as they question the validity of the hype, hinting at potential favoritism in early access distribution. While acknowledging the models' advancements over their predecessors, they slam on the brakes, doubting claims of surpassing genius levels. Revving up their argument with hard evidence from multiple tests, they take these AI wonders for a spin, revealing flaws and errors that put a dent in the AGI dream.
Comparing these cutting-edge models to the likes of Gemini 2.5 Pro and Anthropics Claude 3.7, the team shifts into high gear, casting doubt on the AGI status bestowed upon 03. Despite impressive showings in benchmark tests like competitive mathematics and coding, they slam the brakes on the notion of hallucination-free AI, pointing out major errors that rear their ugly heads. They navigate the winding roads of pricing discrepancies between 03 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, highlighting performance disparities and cost-effectiveness concerns that steer the conversation in a different direction.
Zooming into the models' capabilities, from handling YouTube videos to dissecting metadata with surgical precision, the team peels back the layers of AI sophistication. With a pit stop to discuss training data limits, release notes, and external evaluations, they shift gears, urging viewers to test these AI beasts across various domains to truly gauge their horsepower. With a final lap around the track, they hint at the future of AI performance and scalability, signaling a thrilling race ahead where progress trumps sensational headlines.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch o3 and o4-mini - they’re great, but easy to over-hype on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for o3 and o4-mini - they’re great, but easy to over-hype
Frequency of video uploads
Comparison between London and San Francisco cultures
Spatial reasoning in models
Performance on benchmarks as a measure of AGI
Early access and hyping up models
Tool use for o3 and o4 mini
Cost comparison between o3 and o1-pro
Concerns about LLMs being a dead end
Gemini 2.5 Pro and potential for o4.1
Benchmark-maximizer as a term and its implications for AI development
Related Articles
Exploring AI Advances: GPT 4.1, Cling 2.0, OpenAI 03, and Dolphin Gemma
AI Explained explores GPT 4.1, Cling 2.0, OpenAI model 03, and Google's Dolphin Gemma. Benchmark comparisons, product features, and data constraints in AI progress are discussed, offering insights into the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.
Decoding AI Controversies: Llama 4, OpenAI Predictions & 03 Model Release
AI Explained delves into Llama 4 model controversies, OpenAI predictions, and upcoming 03 model release, exploring risks and benchmarks in the AI landscape.
Unveiling Gemini 2.5 Pro: Benchmark Dominance and Interpretability Insights
AI Explained unveils Gemini 2.5 Pro's groundbreaking performance in benchmarks, coding, and ML tasks. Discover its unique approach to answering questions and the insights from a recent interpretability paper. Stay ahead in AI with AI Explained.
Advancements in AI Models: Gemini 2.5 Pro and Deep Seek V3 Unveiled
AI Explained introduces Gemini 2.5 Pro and Deep Seek V3, highlighting advancements in AI models. Microsoft's CEO suggests AI commoditization. Gemini 2.5 Pro excels in benchmarks, signaling convergence in AI performance. Deep Seek V3 competes with GPT 4.5, showcasing the evolving AI landscape.